Impractical analysis because where are you going to get 1" wires and who
could possibly afford 700 feet of it? Plus the cost of getting it a foot
down in rock?
I'm on pretty much solid rock here, 1800 feet up on the side of a hill, and
that would cost a fortune to do.
Still not clear about the need/reason. Why not just totally disconnect and
reconnect the tower when you operate? That's what I do here and the tower
is not grounded other than by its proximity due to the factory base 5 feet
deep in solid rock. My station is completely broken from the tower when I
am not operating and I don't operate in storms. There is nowhere for
lightning to go that would harm my station.
Michael Goins, k5wmg
University of Texas at San Antonio
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Jim Lux <email@example.com> wrote:
> On 11/16/12 6:46 AM, K1TTT wrote:
>> I plugged that into my lightning modeling software... if I put 7 radial
>> wires(NO rods) 1" in diameter (a bit smaller surface area than 2" strap),
>> bury it 1' in solid rock (ignoring any advantage of topsoil above the
>> and run them out 100' (to equal your 700') I get a ground resistance of
>> about 8 ohms... as good as 20 rods 8' long by 1" diameter in good loam...
>> still sounds like overkill to me. If I allow for 1' of topsoil on the
>> with the wires on the rock it goes down to under 6 ohms. To put that in
>> perspective, the 'normal' 2 rods in loam calculates out to over 70 ohms,
>> common clay that reduces to 35 ohms.
> This brings up an interesting question... Off hand, I would expect that
> laying a bunch of radials (not too long, but lots of them) of not very big
> wire (AWG14 or AWG12) might be a better lightning ground for the dollar
> than any of the other strategies (except concrete and wire.. great ground,
> and concrete is cheaper than copper)
> Time consuming to install (compared to driving a single rod)
> TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk mailing list