Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Station interference Stubs

To: jim@audiosystemsgroup.com, towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Station interference Stubs
From: <ai2n@twcny.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 20:24:59 -0500
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
I have some Belden 8213 (RG-11, fairly low loss 75 ohm).  Could this coax be 
used for stubs in a 50 ohm system?

73, Redd - AI2N

---- Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com> wrote: 
> On 2/12/2013 12:22 PM, Mike Baker wrote:
> > Stubs can do a pretty good job but for 160M the line losses will
> > kill you.
> 
> NOT if you use the right coax. RG6 is a bad idea for this, but a decent 
> RG8 or RG213 with solid PE dielectric will kill the 2nd harmonic by 24 
> dB,  See specific recommendations, tuning instructions, and measured 
> data  in the Coax and Stubs Q&A, link posted a few hours ago.  I haven't 
> measured the attenuation of 160M by a shorted 160M stub on an 80M 
> system, but interpolating from other measurements, I'd guess about 25 dB.
> 
> The W3NQN filters are first rate.  I recently finished a survey of all 
> the contesting bandpass filters I could lay my hands on. Lots of 
> measured data and analysis, as well as reports from several major 
> contest clubs on reliability.
> 
> http://audiosystemsgroup.com/BandpassFilterSurvey.pdf
> _______________________________________________
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>