Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] FW: hexagonal beams and height above ground

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: [TowerTalk] FW: hexagonal beams and height above ground
From: "KM5VI" <km5vi@flukey.cc>
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2013 16:56:47 -0600
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
NEC models I ran a few years back predicted wave angle elevation patterns at
varying installation heights similar to (most) any horizontal beam antenna.

KM5VI



-----Original Message-----
From: TowerTalk [mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Jim
Hoge
Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2013 9:53 AM
To: towertalk
Subject: [TowerTalk] hexagonal beams and height above ground

Has anyone modeled hexagonal beams with regard to height above ground? I am
very leery of the statements that they perform better when lower to the
ground, specifically that on 20m, a height of 40 feet is best. I think
Gotham antenna when advertising goes against the norm. I have seen a few
elevation plots but wonder what is at work to make this fly in the face of
convention.

tnx,
Jim W5QM
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [TowerTalk] FW: hexagonal beams and height above ground, KM5VI <=