Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] N4MB Question

To: "'WK1W Ivan Shapiro'" <WK1W@ivanshapiro.com>, <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] N4MB Question
From: "Dick Dievendorff" <dieven@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 09:24:01 -0700
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
The cost of engineering calculations acceptable to my planning authority for
a one-off "adapter plate" might be high. Maybe not.  But the numbers
provided by the tower manufacturer wouldn't apply unless you used the base
designed for that tower.

Maybe you don't need those calculations for your specific situation. But I
would.

It's another component in a critical place.

73 de Dick, K6KR


-----Original Message-----
From: TowerTalk [mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of WK1W
Ivan Shapiro
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2013 9:13 AM
To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] N4MB Question

N4MB wrote:

 

I've been looking for a replacement that would fit on the current base -

RCB-70 in a robust base as specified for the LM-470 and the LM-354HD. No
towers in good shape have popped up.

 

So here is an idea; not sure if it will work. Perhaps the group will
weigh-in on it:

 

If you purchased or had base plans for another tower, perhaps an "ADAPTER"
could be made, wherein the adapter fits on your current base and allows the
new tower to sit on it.  Of course it would have to be quite sturdy and
heavy.  Thoughts?

 

73

Ivan

WK1W

 

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>