Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Impact of high water table levels on antennas

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Impact of high water table levels on antennas
From: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2013 17:43:00 -0800
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
On 11/3/13 5:25 PM, Rudy Bakalov wrote:
So, what is a desirable skin depth- low or high value?

It depends on the loss. A shallow skin depth is usually better, since you get shallow depths with high conductivity (e.g. copper is better than brass, and has shallower skin depth).

The real issue is that if you have something like dry soil over a shallow water table, there's not much loss in the dry soil, and the dominant effect is that water table, even if it's a couple meters down.

This also is where blindly using numbers from MF broadcast stations (e.g. the FCC charts of soil properties) may be misleading for HF. The wavelength in the soil goes as 1/square root of epsilon, so if the epsilon is 13 (the classic "good soil" number), the wavelength "in the soil" is about a quarter what it is in air. So a layer that's 1-2 meters down is actually about 1/4 wavelength for 14 MHz.

When you're a BC station at 1 MHz in the 300 meter band, this is less of an issue. Skin depth is deeper (goes as 1/sqrt(frequency)), but the wavelength is much longer.

For H-pol a grazing angles, the difference isn't much (the air/surface reflects most of the power), but if you're looking at verticals, or a low horizontal antenna, this kind of thing can account for a lot of the difference between "observed" and "expected" performance.


I'll also point out that soil properties are not particularly homogenous, at least in places where I've measured them. Maybe if you're out in a plain with hundreds of feet of soil deposited long ago, and no local water variations, it's consistent, but in any sort of suburban environment, there's huge differences in soil properties over distances of a few meters.




Rudy N2WQ

Sent using a tiny keyboard.  Please excuse brevity, typos, or inappropriate 
autocorrect.

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk


_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>