Scott, A very innovative and cost effective idea that fender washer. Do
you suppose maybe a little silicon rubber (RTV) carefully applied might
give the washer a longer life. I suppose you could just form a washer
of your own out of silicon rubber caulk and after it cured sufficiently
make a small hole for the shaft. Silicon rubber caulk like the good GE
or Dow Corning stuff seems to last forever and never seems to harden of
get age cracks.
Patrick NJ5G
On 4/4/2014 7:28 AM, Scott Bullock wrote:
John one thing I have done with some success with prosistel rotors is to put a rubber fender
washer with a 1/8" hole in the middle over the shaft of the pot right at the
shaft/bushing of the pot. The small diameter hole causes the washer to "warp" down
at the edges and makes it look like a little Chinese tiki hat. It sheds any condensation/water
coming down the shaft. I got 3 years out of that until the rubber started to dry out and
become hard. We had zero problems until this happened. It was the most trouble free time
we've ever had with these. Could be very easily done on the ring rotors too fwiw.
Scott
N1CX
Salty's
www.radios-online.com
On Apr 4, 2014, at 8:18 AM, john@kk9a.com wrote:
Apparently there are at least two common TIC ring problems, gear slippage
and indicator failure.
Gear slippage should not occur if the guide roller holds the ring gear
against the motor. The further the motor is from the roller the more
likely it will disengage. I have not seen this problem with my older style
units.
The sensor is a potentiometer and unfortunately it is mounted in a box
that is not very waterproof. A pot with an IP67 water resistance rating
would sure be nice but I have yet to find one. Most pots that I have
found seem to have no shaft seal and with them facing upward eventual
failure is likely. Switching to a different positioning indicator such as
a reed switch is also a possibility, but this is a major design change.
John KK9A
To: "towertalk@contesting.com" <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] TIC Potentiometer
From: "Zivney, Terry" <00tlzivney@bsu.edu>
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2014 02:17:42 +0000
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
I seem to recall K1TTT said the earliest rings used a pulse counter
instead of
the pot. The implication being that the pulse counter approach had problems
and was upgraded to the pot.
A basic problem with putting the whirling magnet on the motor shaft is
that it
only counts how many times the motor shaft turns. But, many of he rings
appear to skip or slip or miss a beat (whatever you want to call it). So, the
ring location is computed by counting the number of rotations of the motor,
not the rotations of the ring.
In my case, the pot reliably follows the motor and the spur gear that is
supposed to drive the ring. The problem with inaccurate readout is not
caused in these cases by the pot but rather by the spur gear and ring
gear losing contact from time to time.
It seems that is also the case with the ring in the recently posted YouTube
video of a TIC ring problem.
A pulse counting technique that is counts motor revolutions is not inherently
superior to a precision potentiometer geared to that same motor. The
selected
pot is a ten-turn pot which has lots of resolution potential (sic).
Terry N4TZ
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________
No infections found in this incoming message
Scanned by iolo System Shield
http://www.iolo.com
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|