Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Guyed + self supporting /2 ??

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Guyed + self supporting /2 ??
From: "Roger (K8RI) on TT" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 02:49:16 -0400
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>

After much repeated discussion on this forum over the years I asked a
structural engineer about this, and he confirmed what you are saying - that basically a guy system could be designed for pretty much any *self supporter* to favorably affect it's load limits (within a reasonable footprint), but that it would be silly to start out designing one that way since it would be a waste of materials. If you're going to guy a tower, use a *guyed tower*.

But when someone says *you MUST not guy a self supporter*, it makes me cringe.

Why. A self supporter can be designed for guys, but most are not. If they are not designed with the guy forces taken into account, you are just gambling.

73

Roger (K8RI)


-Steve K8LX
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk


--

73

Roger (K8RI)


_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>