Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] RF Ground is a Myth

To: Hans Hammarquist <hanslg@aol.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] RF Ground is a Myth
From: Brian Carling <bcarling@cfl.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 17:51:51 -0500
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Somebody could conclude from this that you should not bother grounding your 
equipment in the shack if you using a dipole or another antenna that does not 
work against ground.

However I can think of several different reasons why it's a good idea to use 
the typical grounding scheme that has been recommended for amateur radio use 
for many decades now. You ground each piece of equipment in the shack as 
recommended. For me it just makes things work a lot better. So it is doing 
something more than just lightning protection.

Best regards - Brian Carling
Mr. Empirical




> On Jan 22, 2015, at 5:17 PM, Hans Hammarquist via TowerTalk 
> <towertalk@contesting.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> Gentlemen,
> 
> 
> Ithink we can conclude that any "grounding/bonding" systemis "only" for 
> lightning protection and for our safety, andis not that good as an RF ground. 
> RF grounding, when needed, shouldbe treated separate from the lightning 
> protection.
> 
> 
> Apoint here is what the lightning protection is for? 
> 
> 
> We canencapsulate our radio shack, radio bunker, what-have-you withshielded 
> walls. floor and ceiling, surge protections for power lines,antenna feeders 
> etc to a point that the equipment is protected fromlightning strikes without 
> any grounding what-so-ever. (I have triedto do that with my newly built 
> shack.) Grounding the shack can evenbe counter-active as the current from a 
> lightning strike in the towermay go through the equipment in the shack to the 
> ground.
> 
> 
> Ourgrounding rods, Ufer ground etc is to limit damages to thesurrounding, 
> connected to our shack by power lines, telephone linesetc. The better 
> grounding/bonding system we have, the less damageswill happen to equipment in 
> the surrounding, not protected by our own elaborateprotection. It's the same 
> reason the utilities are grounding/bondingtheir lines and equipment with 
> extensive use of grounding rods.
> 
> 
> Ihave nine rods connected to my tower, three per leg. I don't know ifthis is 
> enough and I hope not ever to find out. I have a heavyconductor connected 
> between my tower and the shield surrounding my shack,hope that a strike to my 
> tower will not damage equipment in my shack. The shield is “only” grounded 
> through the  tower and its groundconnection as I don't want current from a 
> strike to go through the shield if I can avoid it.
> 
> 
> Best 73 de,
> 
> 
> Hans - N2JFS
> _______________________________________________
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>