Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] RF Ground is not a Myth

To: "Towertalk" <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] RF Ground is not a Myth
From: "Don " <w7wll@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 19:24:00 -0800
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Ground is only a reference point relative to a measurement, whatever type it is.
Don W7WLL

-----Original Message----- From: Jack Brindle
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2015 6:54 PM
To: Tower Talk
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] RF Ground is not a Myth

Adding a bit to K9YC’s discussion, a ground plane, or any “ground” in a piece of equipment may indeed be at 0 volts as far as DC power is concerned, but it is also an excellent carrier for other signals. It is very common for RF to be conducted on that ground plane, and even emitted to the surroundings. I had a problem once at a large radio commercial vendor I worked for where the 250th harmonic of a 7 MHz microcontroller oscillator was deceasing the receiver - the rf was being conducted specifically on the ground plane trace of the radio, along with DC and a few other signals. The discovery astounded many excellent RF engineers, and reminded us of the premise of this discussion, at RF, there is no such thing as ground.
- Jack B, W6FB


On Jan 23, 2015, at 6:15 PM, Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com> wrote:

On Fri,1/23/2015 3:20 PM, Steve Maki wrote:
Can't one specify a perfect ground (even though impossible in the real world) when modeling antennas? Is that not a useful exercise as an educational tool?
"Specify?" I think you mean "assume." But few antennas depend upon a 
connection to earth for their operation (some RX antennas do).
One can ASSUME a homogenous earth of known properties for the purpose of 
modeling an antenna, but that's not what this discussion is about, nor 
does in involve a CONNECTION to the earth, nor is the fairy tale that is 
the subject of this email useful. Rather, modeling programs consider the 
interaction of electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (and 
wavefronts) with the earth. The coupling of the fields results in loss 
(for real earth) and the interaction of the wavefronts produces the 
vertical pattern.
The only good reason for assuming homogenous (uniform) earth is that it 
makes the math simple enough that we can write the equations and solve 
them on computers that we can afford to have on our desks, and within a 
reasonable length of time.
There's another major point about this. Circuit common is NOT a single 
point. When we draw schematics, we show only half of the circuit -- the 
signal flow through components. But current flows in loops, the return 
path -- what EMC guru Henry Ott calls "the hidden schematic lurking the 
ground symbol." Those return paths can be well controlled -- a 
transmission line -- or they can be random and uncontrolled.
When we build our circuits on multi-layer boards with a continuous layer 
forming a ground plane under a layer with traces on it, the trace and 
ground layer form an unbalanced transmission line, and the current on the 
trace returns in a narrow area directly under the trace, minimizing 
crosstalk and making the circuit more stable. If there is no ground layer, 
or if the ground layer is broken under a trace, the return current finds 
whatever random path it finds, depending on the whim of the equipment 
designer, and the circuit is subject to crosstalk, noise pickup, noise 
radiation, and circuit instability.
If you look inside a good power amp or antenna tuner, you will see coax 
running between the antenna switches and relays. The signal returns on the 
coax shield. Poorly designed units omit the coax, using single wires, and 
the current returns on the chassis. The otherwise very nice Ten Tec 
antenna tuners have that design defect -- try measuring a 6M antenna 
through that tuner. It's a mess. By contrast, Ten Tec HF power amps use 
coax for antenna switches, and 6M goes through just fine (with the amp 
inactive, of course).
73, Jim K9YC
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>