Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Trash talk and M2

To: xaxaxaxa yayayaya <Cqtestk4xs@aol.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Trash talk and M2
From: Lizeth Norman <normanlizeth@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 08:05:50 -0400
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
I'll continue to characterize exactly what I see when confronted with
the accusations of people like him. I will not be intimidated by a
loudmouthed ignoramus.

Too bad. The language is tame compared to what is on tv.

BOO HOO!! Would you like some tissues??

Are you trying to astroturf, too??

Did you have a look at the pics?? Probably not. Just going off half
cocked, I bet!



On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 7:54 AM, Bill via TowerTalk
<towertalk@contesting.com> wrote:
> This reflector is not a place for this kind of post!
>
> Take your bar fight out and gutter language out back in the alley  and
> finish this in private.
>
> This reflector is not a place for personal attacks nor is it a  place for
> gutter talk.  No need to cc. it to the reflector.   K7LXC please give a
> warning to this "ham".
>
> My two cents:  K6MYC and the two companies he started have  always given me
> good service, good prices and good antennas...all 30+ of  them over the
> years.  Are they perfect?  No.  Have I had problems  with included parts or
> defective parts in the boxes I received?  Yes.   However, they have always
> quickly resolved those issues quickly and  fairly.  My experiences with KLM 
> and
> M2 run from the early 80s through  2012  I like the service and products
> from M2 enough to consider them for  my next station.
>
> I have no interest in M2, just a pretty satisfied  customer.
>
> K4XS/KH7XS
>
>
> In a message dated 4/14/2015 11:36:32 A.M. Coordinated Universal Tim,
> normanlizeth@gmail.com writes:
>
> Hey  Chuck!
>
> I'm here to tell you that both Mike and his bride are  unprintable
> names. I find that those type of  people get EXACTLY what  they
> deserve. In this case, I'm merely the courier of their own  mistakes.
> Ones like cutting corners on things like QUALITY CONTROL!!!!!  Look at
> the pics: if you've got any questions, look again.
>
> I'd be  happy to send you pictures of the completed antenna, the tower,
> the  station. What would you like? I'll BE EXTREMELY HAPPY TO
> ILLUSTRATE WHAT A  LIAR YOU ARE!!!!
>
> You, sir, personally, are a lying sack of shit who is  trying to cover
> his buddies' ass whose pants were caught WAY WAY down. Go  astroturf
> somewhere else.  You do know what astroturfing is, right? If  not,
> google is your friend.
>
> Don't you have a MONEY interest in  this??? That makes you INELIGIBLE
> to have any say in what goes on  here.
>
> Have a look at the pics. Feel free to weep. Look again. Those  fools
> let a MAJOR blunder leave their factory. It's more than 50%  screwed
> up. Not only that, I own it. Moreover, the documentation and item  are
> available for inspection in EL89va at any reasonable time of day.  My
> qth is less than 2 miles from I-75 as the crow flies.
>
> Look at the  pics. If you need, get a new pair of glasses. If there's
> still a problem,  visit a psychiatrist.
>
> I will continue to defend my UNASSAILABLE  position as long as I still
> have breath. 50% of a $700 antenna that's  broken is unacceptable!
>
> HERE'S A CLUE FOR YOU, FOOL!  I'm 42 and  have been a ham 20 years. Not
> only do I know the truth, odds are I'll be  around a while to tell it.
>
> Feel free to soak your head. While you're  there, tell Mike and that
> ignorant c@nt (oops, I decided to name a name!!  Bad me!!) he's married
> to I said hi!
>
> Norman J  McSweyn
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>