Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Rotator Lightning Protection

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Rotator Lightning Protection
From: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 09:26:16 -0400
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Back in May, I was discussing the addition of lightning protection in a M2 RC2800PX controller. At the time, I had installed a vacuum relay at the controller output to isolate the switching MOSFET from lightning exposure. But, I later realized that a Polyphaser MOV short to ground on the controller's return lead could result in the rotator turning out of control. Recall that prop-pitch rotators don't normally use limit switches unless the user customizes his own protection system. This week, I added a second vacuum relay to isolate the +48V supply lead. Now, two SPST vacuum relays form a DPST relay. One pole isolates the supply, the other isolates the MOSFET drain lead. You can see both relays in the photos below. Due to cabinet constraints, the relays are not installed adjacent to each other.

http://tinyurl.com/po8u72y
http://tinyurl.com/oknt64n

In the first photo you can see the controlling MOSFET, the device known to ground-short and also cause the rotator to turn out of control. I have seen many references to MOSFET failure in these controllers Because the +48V supply side is always active to the prop-pitch coils, it's imperative to protect the rotator in the event of a source-to-drain short. The MOSFET gate is normally pulsed with a PWM circuit. The pulse duty-cycle is what determines rotator speed. Now, even if the MOSFET shorts, the relays will activate/deactivate -- and certainly hot-switch, but the rotator will still stop at its target bearing. The MOSFET is now mostly vulnerable only during a turn. But even with the inclusion of the vacuum relays, "anything goes" with a direct strike. For nearby induced surges, the relays should adequately protect the controller, at least better than the stock design that offers almost no protection at all. With the remote site being 30 miles to the NW of my control point, the lightningmaps.org website has been indispensible for letting me know when strikes are too close to turn the arrays.

In the controller's stock configuration, a thin Sil-Pad insulator is used between the MOSFET and chassis. You can see the Sil-Pad is now replaced with a thick ceramic insulator that offers greater breakdown potential between the MOSFET and chassis. In the first photo, a new terminal strip can be seen with a 2N7000 switching FET. The small FET drives the relay coils and was only going to be used for brief testing. However, according to the Fairchild data sheet, it will handle 4X more switching current than the present 100 mA draw. So, it stays for now.

Paul, W9AC



_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [TowerTalk] Rotator Lightning Protection, Paul Christensen <=