Ok, this even makes mathematical sense (as it should):
Assume the wind angle is with respect to the antenna direction. Total area =
Element area * COS (angle) + Boom area * SIN(angle)
First derivative is: EA*SIN(angle) - BA*COS(angle) = 0
A little manipulation gives: angle (max area) = Arctan(BA/EA)
Sanity check: if boom is really big w/r to elements, angle approaches 90
degrees. If elements are big, angle approaches zero. As you noted, if boom =
elements, angle = 45 degrees.
Thanks for the thought provoking discussion. This should have been obvious but
never took the time to work it out. The software does all the work these days
and pencil and paper are pretty much dead.
Ken K6MR
From: Joe Subich, W4TV
Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2016 10:37
To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] W6NL 40m Moxon
On 4/10/2016 12:05 PM, Ken K6MR wrote:
> Thanks Joe. I was thinking about wind vectors but didn’t work it through.
I used 45 degrees here because the element and boom components were
nearly the same. If one had long boom 6 or 10 meter antennas it would
probably be necessary to solve for the angle of maximum force somewhere
between broadside to the boom and 45 degrees. With short, thin
elements a long boom is a much larger contributor than the elements.
73,
... Joe, W4TV
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|