Imaginary modes by text messaging? Boy aren't you full of stuff tonight?
On September 30, 2017 8:31:25 PM EDT, Wes Stewart <wes_n7ws@triconet.org> wrote:
>It may be terrible, but it's better than no antenna at all.
>
>I have 72 DXCC entities worked using an inverted-V, 45' high at the
>center with
>ends barely off the ground. Some of these with a barefoot K3, the rest
>with a
>KPA500. All either CW or SSB, no imaginary modes where QSOs are
>completed by
>text messaging.
>
>And this wasn't from a beach in New England but from the desert of
>southern Arizona.
>
>Wes N7WS
>
>On 9/30/2017 1:31 PM, john@kk9a.com wrote:
>> From my experience and lower heights a
>> 160m dipole is a terrible antenna, I would not bother adding it to
>your fan.
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>TowerTalk mailing list
>TowerTalk@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|