I believe that to be true of the editorial staff of QST. I too often
find myself disgusted by technical errors in QST. But one of the authors
of this piece, KE4PT, has a pretty serious EE education, and is the
current editor of QEX. Dunno about W4RQ.
IMO, the worst thing about the article is the title. And, I suspect that
the piece may have been the victim of excessive editing.
73, Jim K9YC
On 2/7/2018 2:34 PM, Tom Osborne wrote:
I think the problem with this article, along with many other antenna
articles.is they have nobody to proof read and see if this is actually
factual or not. I have seen many articles in QST that I read and shake my
head wondering where they got their info from.
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|