Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] 40m 4el KLM - replacing linear loading with coils

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] 40m 4el KLM - replacing linear loading with coils
From: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 15:20:15 -0700
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Definitely true.

There is some benefit, however, to use two loading coils on either side of center for each element (instead of center coils) because that gives better current distribution along the elements.  Most modern Shorty-40's do this, and it's the same reason why some mobile vertical antennas use center loading instead of base loading.
I suspect that using two coils for each element might even be stronger 
mechanically since the split elements have less cantilever weight where 
the two coils are positioned versus a single center one.
73,
Dave   AB7E



On 4/28/2020 2:19 PM, jimlux wrote:
One could also simplify the overall design - make all elements exactly 
the same length, and use different values of the center loading 
inductance to "tune" the elements.  There's nothing special about the 
physical length of the elements, other than it creates the right 
impedance at the right frequency, and you can get there with loading 
reactance.
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>