Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] NVIS

To: towertalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] NVIS
From: Steve Maki <lists@oakcom.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 11:10:47 -0400
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Tim,

You were obviously going for best high angle *RX* capability, which requires attenuation of all low angle (i.e. static) reception. Truly a specialized antenna.

-Steve K8LX

On 06/11/20 10:27 AM, Tim Duffy wrote:
Hello Wilson:

Each radial (6) is 95 feet long. There are two that are directly under the two 
sides of the dipole the other four start out at the feedpoint of the dipole and 
the ends are 3 feet apart with respect to the ones that are directly below the 
dipole.

I used this low height (20 feet flat) resonant dipole antenna for a long time 
without the radials on the ground and it worked great (NVIS). I think it works 
better with the radials - but not night and day better.

There was a question about my S0 noise level. That is a result of no switching 
supplies in the shack or house and working with the power company and neighbors 
to eliminate all man made noise sources. Also correctly grounding and bonding 
antennas, towers and shack components. Lots of ferrite in the right places. And 
a few visits from K3RFI!

73
Tim K3LR

-----Original Message-----
From: Wilson Lamb [mailto:infomet@embarqmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2020 10:16 AM
To: Tim Duffy
Cc: 'undefined'
Subject: RE: [TowerTalk] NVIS

Hi Tim,
What's the orientation of the "radials"?
Are they maybe parallel to the antenna?  Cut to be reflectors?
Have you compared that antenna to a higher dipole in about the same orientation?
I'm sure going to listen for it.
WL
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>