Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Modeling a Yagi in EZNec

To: Tom Hellem <tom.hellem@gmail.com>, towertalk <TowerTalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Modeling a Yagi in EZNec
From: Máximo EA1DDO_HK1H <ea1ddo@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 15:36:03 +0000
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Personally, I never include the leads.
We should try to get them as short as possible.

Then, if the design has never tested before... Some adjustment are highly 
likely.

73, Maximo EA1DDO

________________________________
De: TowerTalk <towertalk-bounces@contesting.com> en nombre de Tom Hellem 
<tom.hellem@gmail.com>
Enviado: miércoles, 29 de mayo de 2024 15:27
Para: towertalk <TowerTalk@contesting.com>
Asunto: [TowerTalk] Modeling a Yagi in EZNec

Those who use NEC to model a yagi, do you include the lead lengths in the
model for the connecting wires that go from the balun to the feed terminals
of the driven element?
If so, do you model them as part of the element itself or as a transmission
line?
My leads are 4" long. So if I model them as part of the element, I would
just describe the center portion of the element to be an 8" piece of say,
#12 wire, then the next portion of the element would contain the correction
for the element to boom clamps.
Do I have this right or am I overthinking it?
My goal is to get the model perfected to the point that when I actually
build the beam, I will not have to make adjustments in the lengths of the
driven elements to bring them to resonance.
Maybe that's an unreasonable expectation, or not?

Any input appreciated.

Tom Hellem
K0SN
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>