> Reply-to: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> From: "Lane C. Zeitler" <email@example.com>
> To: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Subject: [TRLog] TR vs. CT
> Date: Tue, 7 Oct 1997 15:44:49 -0700
> Fellow Contestors,
> After a 14 year lay off I am getting back into contesting. I have borrowed
> a friends CT logging program and boy talk about difficult!!
After using CT for a number of years I switched to TR. I have found
it to be a more stable program (primarily in the networking
environment) and I have found the pricing to be much more to my
liking (I did become a life member due to being happy with the wya
the program performs). After meeting Tree and George at Dayton, I
found them to be very responsive to some ideas that I had for VHF/UHF
contesting (some of which have already been implemented).
> Is TR like this?? Are all of the contest logging programs this tough to
Once you are use to it, I think you will find it very user friendly.
It took me about an hour to get it down.
> Are they all DOS based??
This is DOS based, which I prefer anyway.
The R. F. Connection
Company Home Page: http://www.therfc.com/
Personal Home Page: http://members.aol.com/wi2t/
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/trlogfaq.html
Administrative requests: trlog-REQUEST@contesting.com
Feature Wishlist: http://web.jzap.com/n6tr/trwish.html