TRLog
[Top] [All Lists]

[TRLog] Fwd: [CQ-Contest] "Worked Before" stupidities

Subject: [TRLog] Fwd: [CQ-Contest] "Worked Before" stupidities
From: N6ZZ@aol.com (N6ZZ)
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 1998 09:02:05 EST
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

--part0_884095327_boundary
Content-ID: <0_884095327@inet_out.mail.aol.com.1>
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

In a message dated 98-01-06 01:55:49 EST, john.devoldere@innet.be writes:

<< I get very excited when someone, be it on CW, Phone or RTTY comes back to
my calls and sends "Worked Before"... Well, If he would be in my log, I
would not call him! I know this has been discussed before, and most, after
having explained that "they" are not in "our" log, give me "another" report. 
>>

Tree...

How about changing the default in TR Log so that the AUTO DUPE ENABLE CQ
parameter = FALSE instead of TRUE?  Whenever I set up a LOGCFG.DAT file,
that's one change that I always make, so that if a dupe calls me, they just
get worked and logged at 0 points.  If that were TR Log's standard
configuration, the problem that John described might be reduced a bit....

73 - Phil, N6ZZ

--part0_884095327_boundary
Content-ID: <0_884095327@inet_out.mail.aol.com.2>
Content-type: message/rfc822
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-disposition: inline

Return-Path: <owner-cq-contest@contesting.com>
Received: from  relay29.mail.aol.com (relay29.mail.aol.com [172.31.109.29]) by
        air28.mail.aol.com (v37.8) with SMTP; Tue, 06 Jan 1998 01:55:49 1900
Received: from dayton.akorn.net (dayton.akorn.net [205.217.100.11])
          by relay29.mail.aol.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/AOL-4.0.0)
          with ESMTP id BAA05501;
          Tue, 6 Jan 1998 01:40:00 -0500 (EST)
Received: from dayton.akorn.net (dayton.akorn.net [205.217.100.11])
        by dayton.akorn.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id BAA09066;
        Tue, 6 Jan 1998 01:39:37 -0500 (EST)
Received: by dayton.akorn.net (TLB v0.10a (1.23 tibbs 1997/01/09 00:29:32));
        Tue, 06 Jan 1998 01:39:27 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <3.0.1.32.19980105203418.00d17f04@pophost.innet.be>
X-Sender: pub02191@pophost.innet.be
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.1 (32)
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 1998 20:34:18 +0000
To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
From: "John Devoldere (ON4UN)" <john.devoldere@innet.be>
Subject: [CQ-Contest] "Worked Before" stupidities
Sender: owner-cq-contest@contesting.com
Precedence: bulk
X-List-Info: http://www.contesting.com/cq-contest-faq.html
X-Sponsor: W4AN, KM3T, N5KO & AD1C
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit

I get very excited when someone, be it on CW, Phone or RTTY comes back to
my calls and sends "Worked Before"... Well, If he would be in my log, I
would not call him! I know this has been discussed before, and most, after
having explained that "they" are not in "our" log, give me "another" report. 

Some profer to argue for 5 minutes instead of giving a report which takes
10 seconds...

The worst experience I recall was this weekend in the ARRL RTTY Roundup
with CT4NH who flatly kept refusing to gives us a report, because "WKD
B4"... He and we must have lost at least 10 minutes in this thing, but he
refused to give us "another" report... 

Are some people so "st..." that they don't understand that because someone
is in their log, it not neccesarily means that "they" are in "our" log...

I get excited everytime someone refuses "another" QSO.

When someone calls us who's already in our log, we just work him. That
fair, fast and smart. The computer program will indicate it as a dupe.
Everybody is happy.

73

John, ON4UN

***************************************************************
*            John Devoldere, ON4UN, AA4OI, OT8T               *
*             e-mail: john.devoldere@innet.be                 *
*                address: Poelstraat 215                      *  
*                         B9820 Merelbele                     * 
*                         Belgium                             *
*                 mailing addres: P.O.Box 41                  *  
*                                 B9000 Gent,                 *
*                                 Belgium                     *
***************************************************************
*                                                             *
      
*  PLEASE CALL US IN THE CONTESTS (ON4UN OR OT8T). THANK YOU! *
*                                                             *
***************************************************************   


--
CQ-Contest on WWW:        http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests:  cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com

--part0_884095327_boundary--

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/trlogfaq.html
Submissions:              trlog@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  trlog-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-trlog@contesting.com
Feature Wishlist:         http://web.jzap.com/n6tr/trwish.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>