I second Tonno's request as far as Russian DX contest is concerned. I
have tried the difficult route more then one year ago requesting Trey
to include RDXC into Cabrillo specs. We went as far as Cabrillo
version 3 (proposed) on his site. Anyway nothing happened since last
year December. Trey stopped answering emails. I have got reports from
several other people who tried to extend Cabrillo specs for
additional contest that they have encountered similar situation with
Trey not responding. That includes some software writers as well.
So may be Tree find it possible to implement Cabrillo like output for
Russian DX contest and the problem will get solved for the time
73, Igor UA9CDC
> Anyway, if there is this Template for all CQ and ARRL contest then
> could be also perfectly applied to other similar contests with
> that TR Log supports. Russian DX, EU Sprint would be the most
> only thing needed is to have the sent serial at position 49, maybe
> add it for those contests?
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tree" <email@example.com>
> To: "Tonno Vahk" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Cc: "TRLog Reflector" <email@example.com>
> Sent: 23. aprill 2005. a. 21:22
> Subject: Re: [Trlog] Serial numbers in Cabrillo
> > On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 08:04:44PM +0300, Tonno Vahk wrote:
> >> I have been confused about it for a while. Why does TR not
> >> correct
> >> Cabrillo with sent serial numbers for several large contests.
> >> Russian
> >> DX for example. I can't send the organizers CBR and have to send
> >> Also
> >> EU Sprints, etc.. The Cabrillo file is just empty at the place
> >> serial
> >> number should be.
> >> For WPX it does put sent serial numbers but NOT TO CORRECT
PLACE. On WPX
> >> website the correct Cabrillo format shows serial numbers
starting a few
> >> digits after the RST but TR puts them right before the Stations
> >> Is
> >> this acceptable for WPX organizers??
> >> Could somebody explain me why is this and am I missing
something. Can I
> >> reconfigure TR somehow to include sent serial numbers correctly?
> >> Organizers
> >> of those contests promote that TR is perfect for those contests,
> >> it
> >> then?
> > TR (at one time) supported all of the contests listed on the
> > web page.
> > It might be that I have fallen behind and there are ones there
> > are not being supported.
> > You can find the contests listed here:
> > http://www.kkn.net/~trey/cabrillo/qso-template.html
> > For a contest to say it uses the Cabrillo standard, it should be
> > on this page.
> > There is no way for a user to program POST to support a contest
> > isn't already supported. If you can provide me the information
> > the contests you are concerned about - I will see if I can add
> > However, they should go through the process of being added to the
> > Cabrillo web page. The Cabrillo people might ask them to make
> > to minimize the difference between they contest and some other
> > For example, I can't understand why QSO numbers have to be in a
> > different place than the CQ WPX contest (not having more data).
> > Tree
> Trlog mailing list
Trlog mailing list