| To: | <vhfcontesting@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [VHFcontesting] Re: Captive rovers |
| From: | tree@kkn.net (Tree) |
| Date: | Tue Jul 29 09:55:45 2003 |
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 06:27:52AM -0700, John Geiger wrote: > OK, but wouldn't "operating practices" still include > staying up all 36 hours operating? It could, but that is an extreme interpretation of a rule that is "trying" to be reasonable. Tree |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [VHFcontesting] Re: captive rovers, dpease@adams.net |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [VHFcontesting] re: captive rovers, Warren Walsh |
| Previous by Thread: | [VHFcontesting] Re: Captive rovers, dpease@adams.net |
| Next by Thread: | [VHFcontesting] Re: Captive rovers, Zack Widup |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |