To: | vhfcontesting@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | [VHFcontesting] Re: A suggestion for ERP-based Entry Classes (Ward Silver) |
From: | "jon jones" <n0jk@hotmail.com> |
Date: | Mon, 15 Dec 2003 18:28:35 +0000 |
List-post: | <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com> |
Ward has some good suggestions re. the "post-processing" approach to
creating some new award categories. And other organizations can certainly
offer their "own" awards for the ARRL VHF Contest. In fact, I believe the
Central States VHF Society did this a few years ago for the Rover Category. On a similar topic - I would like to see the ARRL re-instate awards for the DX Category. For the 2003 June VHF QSO Party, there were no plaques offered for DX stations. I'm not even sure the top scorers will receive a certificate. There was minimal mention of DX stations in the contest write-up. If there is no awards or incentive for the DX stations, I see DX participation in the June VHF QSO Party dropping. There are 7 announced VHF DXpeditions for summer 2004, all *after* the June VHF QSO Party. There are two (ZF1A and me) announced for the June VHF QSO Party. - Jon N0JK A little more seriously - there are lots of possible categories that could be tried. To suggest that the awards program be changed on a speculative basis is not really very practical. However, if it could be demonstrated that an alternate set of categories did have merit, perhaps formal awards could be created for them. I would suggest a "post-processing" approach. Get band-by-band breakdowns from each of the competitors (which are available as validated data from the ARRL Web pages) and ask for the extra information (HAAT, ERP, number of elements, shoe size, whatever) off-line. Then create post-processing software to see if the results would be of interest. The evaluation could even be done with a spreadsheet. It would certainly generate some interesting graphics. Even if contest sponsors don't want to add more award categories, there's no reason why an organization can't offer it's own award separately. As long as the award requires entrants to follow the rules of the contest and submit logs, I can only see it helping the activity. Example - QRP ARCI sponsors "The Running of the Bulls" and the Collegiate Championship run during HF Sweepstakes. Last year I got a few teams interested in entering a M/S for a WRTC-style team competition during IARU HF Championship. I think this has particular merit in areas away from the big population centers where the usual scoring system doesn't really recognize local and regional winners. 73, Ward N0AX _________________________________________________________________ Wonder if the latest virus has gotten to your computer? Find out. Run the FREE McAfee online computer scan! http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: [VHFcontesting] A suggestion for ERP-based Entry Classes [was:Stupid Categories ...], Hoffman, Mark |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [VHFcontesting] A suggestion for ERP-based Entry Classes, David Olean |
Previous by Thread: | RE: [VHFcontesting] A suggestion for ERP-based Entry Classes [was:Stupid Categories ...], Hoffman, Mark |
Next by Thread: | RE: [VHFcontesting] A suggestion for ERP-based Entry Classes, Bill Olson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |