| To: | Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org> | 
|---|---|
| Subject: | [VHFcontesting] Re: 902 vs 903 | 
| From: | dpease@adams.net | 
| Date: | Thu, 02 Sep 2004 11:39:00 -0500 | 
| List-post: | <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com> | 
| 
Personally, I see advantages to using 145 over 144 for the IF, especially at 
stations where there are more than one transverter using 2 meters for an IF. 
I would think you would want the option of using either 902 or 903 simply by 
changing the IF rig frequency rather than having to change a crystal in the 
transverter.  Danny NG9R Zack Widup writes: On Wed, 1 Sep 2004, Lee Scott - AA1YN wrote: Danny Pease dpease@adams.net ....................................................... Sent using Adams WebMail --- http://webmail.adams.net Adams NetWorks -- Keeping you well-connected worldwide! _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting  | 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> | 
|---|---|---|
 
  | ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [VHFcontesting] Where are the Radiosports fans? [was: Rovingand Hamfests], Ev Tupis | 
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [VHFcontesting] Re: 902 vs 903, Lee Scott - AA1YN | 
| Previous by Thread: | RE: [VHFcontesting] 902 vs 903, Zack Widup | 
| Next by Thread: | Re: [VHFcontesting] Re: 902 vs 903, Lee Scott - AA1YN | 
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |