George Fremin III wrote:
>On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 01:02:41PM -0400, n2lbt@n2lbt.com wrote:
>
>
>>It does not relate to the subject line. It has never been determined
>>if a "Captive Rover" actually exists. It is a mythical creature.
>>
>>
>
>I think it has been shown that indeed they do exist.
>As I recall there have been several posts on this list
>explaining this subject.
>
>ie:
>http://lists.contesting.com/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00294.html
>
>
>
Sorry George...but a reading of the complete thread shows that a
significant number of responders didn't buy the "captive rover" idea and
didn't even agree on its definition. That link proves nothing.
jeff, wa1hco
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
|