VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] Rover Tech: LMR400 or 400UF?

To: Nate Duehr <nate@natetech.com>
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] Rover Tech: LMR400 or 400UF?
From: "Mike (KA5CVH) Urich" <mike@ka5cvh.com>
Reply-to: mike@ka5cvh.com
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 17:03:22 -0500
List-post: <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Nate Duehr wrote:
> JT Croteau wrote:
>> Will I take a noticeable performance hit if I use LMR400 UltraFlex in
>> the rover vs. regular LMR400 coax?  I was planning on using it for 6,
>> 144 and 432, runs will be less than 14'.

Mike wrote

At those frequencies and distances there will be no measurable
difference.

http://harriscountyares.org/resources/docs/coax_comp_chart.pdf

Mike Urich KA5CVH
http://ka5cvh.com
EC - S/E Harris Co.
http://harriscountyares.org
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>