Look Ev, the 'once and once only' grid rule you seem to be in love
with is not going to be acceptable to most rovers .. if roads all ran
N-S or E-W it wouldn't be such a problem, but as people have stated in
most places (including all of my routes in the past) you revisit grids
either because of where the road goes or because you eventually have
to get home ;) Your proposal would drastically reduce the amount of
time I could operate (and increase the amount of time I'd be driving)
..
de w1rt/john
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com> wrote:
> --- On Tue, 2/17/09, Glen Overby <goverby@charter.net> wrote:
>> Ev Tupis wrote:
>> > 1. Rovers calculate their final score by simple summing of their
>> > scores from each individual Grid-4 that they activate.
>
>> Didn't the scoring system used to be like that?
>
> No. There was always an "incentive" quotient at play.
>
>> > 2. Once operation begins from a new Grid-4, it may not
>> > resume in a previously activated Grid-4 for the remainder
>> > of the event.
>>
>> I'm fine with the 30 / 50% QSO limit, and think this is
>> a bad idea.
>
> The 30/50 thing is too difficult for most people to abide by. Why are you
> resistant to the above proposal? It's simple to implement and abide by.
>
> Ev
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> VHFcontesting mailing list
> VHFcontesting@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
>
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
|