VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] PAR Moxon as rove antenna (James Duffey)

To: "vhfcontesting@contesting.com" <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] PAR Moxon as rove antenna (James Duffey)
From: jon jones <n0jk@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 21:35:47 +0000
List-post: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com">mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Pertinent comments by James re. the Moxon vs. a loop antenna for Rover or 
portable operation. 4 - 5 dB gain over a loop may not sound like a lot... but 
it is significant. It will make the difference between calling CQ with no 
replies and running stations during openings. Hearing a weak DX station vs. 
putting them in your log. I have worked James when he was rover/portable in New 
Mexico on Es and he had a great signal on 6.
 
Another option for a rover operating fixed or a portable station on 6 meters is 
the 2 el yagi. I use one for my rover and portable operation. It has about the 
same gain as a Moxon, and my the only costs were the coax. I can put it up in 
less than 5 minutes and it breaks down and fits easily into a Hyuandai Elentra. 
The coax connects directly to the front driven element - no gamma match needed, 
and the SWR is almost a flat 1:1 at 50.125.  I use Radio Shack 5 ft. TV masts. 
A horizontal antenna will work much better on 6 if you can get it up at least 1 
wavelength (18 feet) high.  15 feet is a reasonable compromise, 20 ft. is 
better. I also use a 3 el M2 yagi for portable use, but it takes a lot longer 
to put it together and  it is more cumbersome to put up. The 2 el is my choice 
for "pop up" fixed Rover operating and getting on the air quickly at a rest 
stop or high point. While DX results vary on conditions -- I have worked all 
continents on 6 with the 2 el yagi via Es includin
 g JW7QIA near the north pole from Kansas since 2006.
 
A plan for building a 2 element 6 meter yagi here:
 
http://www.qsl.net/k7yo/6m2yagi.htm
 
The Moxon or 2 el yagi are also good options for a 6 meter attic antenna.
 
 - Jon N0JK
 

> The Moxon is an excellent performer compared to a loop. It particularly 
> shines during marginal band openings, when the band is just opening  and when 
> it is closing. Compared to a loop, it is much easier to hold a run frequency 
> and to attract the attention of strong stations who may not have their 
> antennas pointed towards you.  At 4 dB gain over a dipole, it is probably 5 
> or 6 dB gain over a loop, and that makes a big difference, particularly when 
> signals are near the noise level. If you are running a loop and want to make 
> a big improvement to your rover, go to a Moxon. The cost of the PAR SM-50, 
> which was $100 when I bought it, and I think now is close to $120 with the 
> rise in Al prices. That price is about the same, or not much more than a 
> loop, I see HRO is selling the M2 6M loop for $140, but the results from the 
> Moxon are much better than a loop.
>  
> At 7 ft wide and 31 inches deep, it is a big antenna, but the wire reflector 
> and 5/16 inch side pieces make it fairly light weight. You need to plan for 
> it in the installation. I use 1.25 inch EMT for a mast and that is more than 
> adequate, even with 8 ft antennas for the other bands installed. We drive 
> with it at 10 to 12 feet high and extend it to 15 feet or so when stopped.  
> When I first got the antenna and put it together in the driveway prior to 
> roving, my first thought was ?This is a big antenna?.  About that time 
> Virginia came out of the house looked at the Moxon and said ?That is a big 
> antenna. You?re not going to drive with that on the car are you??  I 
> answered, ?No, you are.? After initial test runs at lower speeds, we 
> concluded that cruising at 75 mph with it on the car was not a problem. With 
> the additional wind loading the gas mileage suffers though.
>  
> If you are into SOTA or portable operation, the Moxon breaks down nicely into 
> a 3 ft long package about 2 inches in diameter and assembles quickly.
>  
> Dale provides excellent support for the antenna and has shipped me side 
> pieces on short notice. No balun is included so you probably should add one, 
> a string of ferrite beads do nicely, and, in case you are wondering, and 
> everyone does, there is nothing magic in that black box except wires 
> connecting the driven element to the SO-239.
>  
> 
> James Duffey KK6MC
> Cedar Crest NM
> 
                                          
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [VHFcontesting] PAR Moxon as rove antenna (James Duffey), jon jones <=