WriteLog
[Top] [All Lists]

[WriteLog] correct way to handle dupes???

To: <writelog@contesting.com>
Subject: [WriteLog] correct way to handle dupes???
From: w9ol@dataflo.net (Bill Heinzinger)
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2000 07:56:31 -0600

----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Doherty" <k1vv@tmlp.com>
To: "Bill Heinzinger" <w9ol@dataflo.net>
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2000 7:35 AM
Subject: Re: [WriteLog] correct way to handle dupes???


> Bill, we just work the dups.. and leave them in ..when we submit the log
...
> they don't count for points ..   so they don't hurt your score ....... .
> 73  Whitey K1VV
>
Yes but what I can't understand is that if the previous but possibly
incorrect qso has the points attached, it is incorrect.
One of the two qsos did not take place.
Assuming the other op is correct and it's not in his log.
So how can points be awarded to the first, incorrect qso?
The second qso, the dupe, is actually the legal qso and should be awarded
the points.
I see your point that the score will work out the same but I would be afraid
that the sponsors log checking software would find the discrepancy resulting
in penalties.

It just seems untidy to me.
Thanks for your time

:  writelog-REQUEST@contesting.com
> > Problems:                 owner-writelog@contesting.com
>
>


--
WWW:                      http://www.contesting.com/writelog
Submissions:              writelog@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  writelog-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-writelog@contesting.com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>