WriteLog
[Top] [All Lists]

[WriteLog] FWD: Feature idea [out-of-band notification]

To: <writelog@contesting.com>
Subject: [WriteLog] FWD: Feature idea [out-of-band notification]
From: w9ol@billnjudy.com (Bill Heinzinger)
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2000 20:20:39 -0600
You may be right but why have to open and run two programs and use obviously
more memory and resources (remember that's what chokes windows programs)
than one program with almost similar features.
A few filtering options would not use the same memory at two programs.

I loaded Writelog and DXTelnet and could see that I obviously used more than
Writelog alone with a cluster connection.

As DXTelnet uses X amount of memory and resources in it's interface which is
not necessary in Writelog it seems to be a duplication of code.

And I love DXTelnet, been a registered user since WAY back. I just use it
alone.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Don Hill" <aa5au@msn.com>
To: "WA9ALS - John" <jfleming@shelbynet.net>; "WriteLog Reflector"
<writelog@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2000 7:59 PM
Subject: Re: [WriteLog] FWD: Feature idea [out-of-band notification]


>
> I concur.  With DXTelnet, you have so many more options available.
> It works perfectly with WriteLog.  You can't ask for a better combination.
>
> It's even works with WriteLog over a network using TCP/IP.
>
> Yes, you must make a change in both the writelog.ini file and in the
> registry of the networked computers, but the changes are easy.
>
> There's no need to add these features to WriteLog when they are
> already available in a separate package that's already setup to work
> with WriteLog.
>
> Good point John.
>
> 73, Don AA5AU
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "WA9ALS - John" <jfleming@shelbynet.net>
> To: "WriteLog Reflector" <writelog@contesting.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2000 9:12 AM
> Subject: Re: [WriteLog] FWD: Feature idea [out-of-band notification]
>
>
> >
> > > Operation: WriteLog would use a file that describes band segments
> > permitted for
> > > each license class in a country.
> >
> > Rather than Wayne adding more programming to WL, seems to me that the
> > easiest way to handle out of band spots is just to use DX Telnet, which
is
> > already compatible with Writelog (and DX4WIN) and allows extensive
filtering
> > options.  With DX Telnet, you can easily set the band limits you want,
and
> > even "listen" to multiple clusters, Internet and RF, all at the same
time
> > with no duplicates or out of band spots, and the spots will appear both
in a
> > window and in the WL bandmap.  I don't see how you can beat that.  DX
Telnet
> > can also be exporting the spots to DX4WIN at the SAME TIME if you like!
> >
> > If interested, just search on DX Telnet, and you'll find it - demo
> > available - no affiliation!  73
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > WWW:                      http://www.writelog.com/
> > Submissions:              writelog@contesting.com
> > Administrative requests:  writelog-REQUEST@contesting.com
> > Problems:                 owner-writelog@contesting.com
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> --
> WWW:                      http://www.writelog.com/
> Submissions:              writelog@contesting.com
> Administrative requests:  writelog-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems:                 owner-writelog@contesting.com
>
>


--
WWW:                      http://www.writelog.com/
Submissions:              writelog@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  writelog-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-writelog@contesting.com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>