Dez,
Have you increased the bandwidth in MMTTY and compared that to the KAM?
(I have a KAM Plus in the closet and haven't used my P38 lately either.)
Jim N7US
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dez in Cyprus" <dez@cytanet.com.cy>
To: <w7ti@dslextreme.com>; <writelog@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 9:44 PM
Subject: Re: [WriteLog] KAM Transmit on RTTY Resolved
I would not be so fast to retire the KAM!
I also run MMTTY in parallel with the KAM, and whilst MMTTY does decode the
weaker
signals better than the KAM, the Kantronics All Mode decodes those stations
who call
slightly off frequency and out of MMTTY's passband. The KAM is without
question more forgiving
when it comes to tuning accuracy, and this I find is very useful to my style
of operation.
73
Dez - ZC4DW
----- Original Message -----
From: Bill W7TI
> Don't be offended Bill, but you'd be better off putting the KAM
> out to pasture and using the MMTTY engine with WriteLog. It's
> free and a much better detector to boot. I've run MMTTY in
> parallel with a KAM using two computers and the same audio feed,
> and MMTTY runs circles around it on weak, noisy signals.
>
> My KAM has been semi-retired. Now all I use it for is driving
> the X-Y input on my oscilloscope. Works great for that.
>
> 73, Bill W7TI
>
> _______________________________________________
> WriteLog mailing list
> WriteLog@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
>
>
_______________________________________________
WriteLog mailing list
WriteLog@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
|