I have to agree with Clive here. There is no reasonable explanation of why
this cannot be done with WriteLog too. One of the few ways that it lags TR.
Nevertheless, it is still a better program to use as it is a widows program
and allows all the other things you might need to run. This can more than
make up for that lack of function.
It is also true that with TRLOG the program from time to time got confused a
to which mode it was in or should be in and could cost you as much time as
the functions saved.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: writelog-admin@contesting.com
> [mailto:writelog-admin@contesting.com]On Behalf Of Clive Whelan
> Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 2:11 PM
> To: Eric Scace K3NA; writelog@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [WriteLog] Operational Characteristics of WL on CW
>
>
> eric@k3na.org>, Eric Scace K3NA wrote:
> > You have the process correct. For S&P, it's not any different
> than what you would have done
> with other programs such as CT.
>
> Not true of those progs. e.g.. TR ( SD?) that use the intelligent
> enter key. iow there exists a
> separate S&P mode which avoids all that pfaffing around. imo
> Having to use all those F keys
> is slow and cumbersome and holds WL back from being the best by
> far. Personally I'm prepared to wait a
> a little while yet.
>
>
>
> 73
>
>
>
> Clive
> GW3NJW
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> WriteLog mailing list
> WriteLog@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
>
|