That should have said Writelogic NOT the auto fixer's WLAN!
Sent from my iPad
On Aug 28, 2012, at 9:33 PM, wb4sq@yahoo.com wrote:
> I've written a VB program which can add & modify fields from WLAN adif files.
> In Florida for the week and should be back home by Sunday, if you want it...
>
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Aug 28, 2012, at 9:34 AM, "Brian Miller" <brianmiller@xtra.co.nz> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Gary
>>
>> The fields that I am looking for are the ADIF QSL_RCVD and QSL_SENT fields.
>> It appears that these fields are not exported by the WL general DX logging
>> module.
>>
>> 73, Brian VK3MI ZL1AZE
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 09:03:53 -0800
>> From: "Gary AL9A" <al9a@mtaonline.net>
>> Subject: Re: [WriteLog] QSL Status Missing in ADI Files Exported from
>> WL
>> To: <WriteLog@contesting.com>
>> Message-ID: <F61B364CDD0C4BF9869E7A0DF0D79E0F@AL9APC>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
>> reply-type=original
>>
>> Brian,
>>
>> I think it is dependent upon which contest module you are using. In looking
>> back through some of my recent contest adi files I see that some of them
>> have the RST_SENT and RST_RCVD fields included while other contests do not.
>> Even though most contests require RST as part of the exchange many of them
>> do not. In my case when I load my contest adi file into my general logger,
>> DXBase 2007, the import routine sets the RSTS and RSTR values to the default
>> of 599. I don't think the lack of these values in the adi file is
>> indicative of a problem in WriteLog.
>>
>> 73,
>> Gary AL9A
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Brian Miller" <brianmiller@xtra.co.nz>
>> To: <WriteLog@contesting.com>
>> Sent: August 25, 2012 6:59 PM
>> Subject: [WriteLog] QSL Status Missing in ADI Files Exported from WL
>>
>>
>>> I note that exporting a WL log to ADIF format results in an ADIF file which
>>> does not seem to include the QSL status field (e.g., sent and received
>>> info)
>>> that is held within the WL database.
>>>
>>> Have others noticed this and/or found a work around?
>>>
>>> 73
>>>
>>> Brian VK3MI ZL1AZE
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> WriteLog mailing list
>> WriteLog@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
>> WriteLog on the web: http://www.writelog.com/
> _______________________________________________
> WriteLog mailing list
> WriteLog@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
> WriteLog on the web: http://www.writelog.com/
_______________________________________________
WriteLog mailing list
WriteLog@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
WriteLog on the web: http://www.writelog.com/
|