WriteLog
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [WriteLog] Keystrokes via Function Key

To: writelog@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [WriteLog] Keystrokes via Function Key
From: "Wayne, W5XD" <w5xd@writelog.com>
Reply-to: w5xd@writelog.com
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 16:12:21 -0800
List-post: <writelog@contesting.com">mailto:writelog@contesting.com>
> N6EE wrote this document on the subject.
> http://www.rttycontesting.com/files/SO2V.pdf
>
> 73, Don AA5AU 
I don't recall having seen that document before. I have two additions to
make:

1. There is some commentary at that URL about using the K3 subreceiver
on a different band than the main receiver and difficulty making it
work. There MIGHT be a solution in writelog.ini. Search the help file
for "K3" and look for this INI setting and its documentation.
|[RIGS]K3_USE_ANT_SWITCH </html/cs_ini_rigs.htm>|||The "MIGHT" caveat is
because that feature in WriteLog was coded purely to the K3
documentation and, as far as I know, I have not received any reports
from actual K3 owners about whether it works or not.

2. The list of rigs that WriteLog supports this way was expanded to a
second rig recently: I believe that most of the discussion in the
above-referenced URL also applies to the Flex-6700. The only exception
is that, because the transmit stream on the Flex is 100% digital, AFSK
has no disadvantages (I don't think the Flex even has an FSK input
connector.) You get the shaped waveforms designed by the TU designer,
but with zero risk of the filtering and distortion issues we've been
trained to fear with AFSK.|
|||||
_______________________________________________
WriteLog mailing list
WriteLog@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
WriteLog on the web:  http://www.writelog.com/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>