Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Opinion on the AL800?

To: <gdaught6@stanford.edu>, <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] Opinion on the AL800?
From: "Gary Smith" <wa6fgi@sbcglobal.net>
Reply-to: Gary Smith <wa6fgi@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 13:58:02 -0700
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
You got me on that one George.  Warming up the cathode IS the reason for the 
time delay.

Had a senior moment.

73,
Gary


----- Original Message ----- 
From: <gdaught6@stanford.edu>
To: <amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 10:47 AM
Subject: Re: [Amps] Opinion on the AL800?


> Gary wrote:
>
>> Only drawback (if this can be addressed as one) is the three or so minute
>> delay for the hi voltage soft start/step/start to do its job.
>
> I believe the 3 minute delay is to allow the indirectly heated cathode to 
> come up to
> operating temperature.  The HV step-start is much faster.
>
> And when you're waiting for the amp to "wake up" because the "new one" is 
> on the
> air, then 3 minutes seems like a very long time!
>
> 73,George T Daughters, K6GT
> CU in the California QSO Party (CQP)
> October 3-4, 2008
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps 

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>