Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] IM distortion and such

To: "'Joe Subich, W4TV'" <w4tv@subich.com>,"'R L Measures'" <r@somis.org>, <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] IM distortion and such
From: "Gary Schafer" <garyschafer@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 22:01:35 -0500
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: amps-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:amps-bounces@contesting.com] On
> Behalf Of Joe Subich, W4TV
> Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 1:02 PM
> To: 'R L Measures'; amps@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [Amps] IM distortion and such
> 
> 
> Rich writes:
> 
> > In my experience, VHF instability is independent of loading
> > since VHF never gets through a low pass Pi tank circuit.
> 
> Another canard ... VHF doesn't need to get through the tank
> circuit.  The damage is almost always at the input (tune padder
> and/or 10/15 meter coil contacts) that is the point that RF voltage
> is the highest.  Remember the output tank transforms a High-Z tube
> to a low-Z antenna ... high-Z is high voltage/low current.
> 
> 73,
> 
>    ... Joe, W4TV

Joe,

That is exactly Rich's point. The degree of loading has no effect on VHF
energy.

73
Gary  K4FMX


_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>