Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] World's worst coax connectors

To: <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>, <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] World's worst coax connectors
From: <vk6jx@bigpond.net.au>
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2023 06:57:57 +0800
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Understood on the music recording front.

Thanks,

John

-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com> 
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2023 2:17 AM
To: vk6jx@bigpond.net.au; amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] World's worst coax connectors

On 4/24/2023 2:28 AM, vk6jx@bigpond.net.au wrote:
> Sorry Jim - you've lost me. I'm very happy for you that you got to 
> engineer Tony Bennett's audio live, but can you try again to tell me 
> if you agree with me or not ? What I described is what is happening 
> all over the known world, as we follow US practice over here as all 
> our refineries were US companies to start with (Worsley Alumina now 
> owned by BHP and Alcoa Alumina)
> - with Kaiser Engineers in the driving seat !

I cited Bennett because the dynamic range of a performance like his is at least 
30 dB greater than that of a rock band, making noise pickup on quieter 
instruments like violins, violas, celli, and harp far more significant than a 
comparable number of mics on a rock band. I have no comment on the methods 
employed in your industry, but the fact that they work for you does not mean 
that they are good practice in pro audio. The applications are very different.

73, Jim K9YC

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>