To: | "Mike McCarthy, W1NR" <lists@w1nr.net>,"Jim Kearman" <jkearman@att.net>, "Amps" <amps@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [Amps] Pi vs Pi-L |
From: | "Jim Tonne" <tonne@comcast.net> |
Date: | Wed, 1 Feb 2006 13:13:56 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
Mike wrote: > Low pass filters only attenuate above 30MHz, so are not adequate > to meet the requirements on the lower bands. I think what was meant here was something along the lines of "A TVI filter cutting off at 30 MHz is not adequate for the lower bands." If I make a 4 MHz lowpass for my 75-meter rig I can easily design it to provide adequate attenuation at the second harmonic and above. - Jim WB6BLD _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Amps] Pi vs Pi-L, Mike McCarthy, W1NR |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Amps] Pi vs Pi-L, Jim Tonne |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Amps] Pi vs Pi-L, Mike McCarthy, W1NR |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Amps] Pi vs Pi-L, peter.voelpel |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |