To: | "David Kirkby" <david.kirkby@onetel.net>, <amps@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [Amps] Could we *all* use the right tube part numbers? |
From: | "k7fm" <k7fm@teleport.com> |
Reply-to: | k7fm <k7fm@teleport.com> |
Date: | Mon, 14 Feb 2005 19:29:08 -0800 |
List-post: | <mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
David said: "I feel we should all try to use the right part number, and not not refer to a 3CX1500 if we mean an 8877 / 3CX15000A7." Then, in the next sentence, says: "I do feel we could do with being a bit more accurate." Question: Shouldn't that be a 88777 / 3CX15000A7? Couldn't pass that up. Colin K7FM --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.783 / Virus Database: 529 - Release Date: 10/25/04 _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [Amps] Could we *all* use the right tube part numbers?, David Kirkby |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Re[2]: [Amps] Ameritron ARB-704 - Photos and Schematic, Charlie |
Previous by Thread: | [Amps] Could we *all* use the right tube part numbers?, David Kirkby |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Amps] Could we *all* use the right tube part numbers?, David Kirkby |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |