To: | "Mike Sawyer" <w3slk@uplink.net>, <kwasny@netzero.net>,"Harold B. Mandel" <ka1xo@juno.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [Amps] Tuning |
From: | "Phil Clements" <philk5pc@tyler.net> |
Reply-to: | Phil Clements <philk5pc@tyler.net> |
Date: | Wed, 22 Dec 2004 18:31:41 -0600 |
List-post: | <mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
Subject: Re: [Amps] Tuning"Why not do a bench test with a good dummy load and a wattmeter? Make a Because you need the antenna you want to use with the amp. the loading will change as you QSY doing the test, and the wattmeter may move for the wrong reasons. I don't own any antennas that are 1:1 vswr all over the band...maybe you guys do???? To ad to that, you could purchase an antenna analyzer, adjust your antenna Ttransmatches are very over-rated by the manufacturers. I only use them for balanced lines. There was an article a few years back in QST about the loss figures in the different brands of commercial transmatches. Very enlightning, indeed. Back in the '50's, the Johnson Matchbox was referred to as the "Johnson Loss Box." Several of the more recent tuners are worse than a Johnson. In addition, most tuners, except when using a resonant antenna, have to be retouched sooner than the amp when moving about. If I can get away without a tuner and get a fair match, this makes things less lossier and usually a little more broad-banded. Then all you would have to do is hook up your amp with minor adjustments and minimum QRM. I hate QRM as bad as Hiram Percy Maxim did......do your testing at noon on 160 and 80 meters, and after the other bands close for the night. (((73))) Phil, K5PC
|
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Amps] lk450 blowing fuses, Joe Isabella |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [Amps] re: freq. vs. tuning, carl seyersdahl |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Amps] Tuning, Mike Sawyer |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Amps] Tuning, kwasny |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |