Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Clipperton-L parasitic suppressors

To: "Ian White GM3SEK" <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>, <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] Clipperton-L parasitic suppressors
From: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 10:50:00 -0500
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
I realize that Ian but wasnt in the mood to raise those wounds again. I felt 
the participants would understand that and leave it alone.

Carl
KM1H


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ian White GM3SEK" <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
To: <amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, March 13, 2010 3:22 AM
Subject: Re: [Amps] Clipperton-L parasitic suppressors


> Carl wrote:
>>
>>Measures was banned from this reflector for his stand and obvious
>>completely wrong theories.
>>
>
> Sorry, Carl, that isn't correct: Measures was not banned for his
> theories (wrong and tiresome though they were).
>
> He was actually banned for bad *behavior*, which was tolerated far
> longer on AMPS than it would have been on many other reflectors.
>
> The archives include some very ugly episodes which drove many readers
> away from AMPS, and they have never come back.
>
>
> -- 
>
> 73 from Ian GM3SEK
> http://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps 

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>