>I read the various listings about QST articles and could
>recall my
> frustration for the same reasons. I have been a member of
> the ARRL since
> 1950 with the exception of a few years when I cancelled my
> membership for
> the reasons stated in previous posts.The latest QST is a
> very good example.
I don't think that article was all that bad. It had
significantly fewer mistakes and more accurate technical
advice than the "Nearly Perfect Amplifier" article.
It would be nice if people would submit articles to QST.
That would cure the lack of articles.
73 Tom
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|