----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
To: <Amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2007 12:35 PM
Subject: Re: [Amps] 50 Ohm Loads
> On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 12:17:29 -0500, jeremy-ca wrote:
>
>>The loads covered up to 1500 KHz or so and
>>above that the cap had to be changed.
>
> I know you said that, but I don't believe it.
Since it was used succcessfuly by a Gates installation team in the 60's that
statement is irrelevant.
540-1700 kHz is a 3:1 range.
> In most RF systems, a dummy load needs to be pretty close to purely
> resistive. It is hard to believe that what you describe could achieve that
> over anything approaching a 3:1 frequency range with a wire wound
> resistor.
> It certainly could be achieved, to some reasonable tolerance, over the
> bandwidth of one broadcast station.
Without knowing the actual construction of the load or resistive element I
fail to understand how you can justify such a blanket statement.
>
>>I see no reason why an inductive resistor cant be used with reactance
>>compensation in a monoband load such as used in a 160 or 80M 4 square.
>
> Over a narrow frequency range it might be made to work.
I have a pair of 100 Ohm 50W to try and have absolutely no doubt that it
will work very well.
Carl
KM1H
>
> 73,
>
> Jim Brown K9YC
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|