| To: | 'Bill Turner' <dezrat@outlook.com>, 'Amps group' <amps@contesting.com>, Jim Garland <4cx250b@miamioh.edu> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Amps] "Conventional" current flow |
| From: | Catherine James <catherine.james@att.net> |
| Reply-to: | Catherine James <catherine.james@att.net> |
| Date: | Mon, 21 Nov 2016 16:12:38 +0000 (UTC) |
| List-post: | <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
Excellent, experiments trump theory any day! 73, Cathy N5WVR -------------------------------------------- Jim Garland wrote: > Here's the explanation about how we know gravity waves travel at light speed. > [details deleted] _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Amps] "Conventional" current flow, Paul Christensen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Amps] "Conventional" current flow, Catherine James |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Amps] "Conventional" current flow, Catherine James |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Amps] "Conventional" current flow, Catherine James |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |