Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Alpha

To: "jim@audiosystemsgroup.com" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>, "amps@contesting.com" <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] Alpha
From: Chris Wright via Amps <amps@contesting.com>
Reply-to: "vk2uw@yahoo.com" <vk2uw@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2017 00:00:29 +0000 (UTC)
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Re contacting Mike Dishop.
A well know Buisness Person has been trying to contact Mike Dishop for over the 
past 2 months without any luck or replies.
He has tried both the New Number and old numbers plus even as late as today 
left messages to no avail.
I can supply the contact numbers tried to no email, no return calls or none 
answered by Mike Dishop for over 2 months.
Yours truly Chris Wright 

Sent from Yahoo7 Mail on Android 
 
  On Wed, 4 Oct. 2017 at 10:40 am, Jim Brown<jim@audiosystemsgroup.com> wrote:  
 On 10/3/2017 2:27 PM, Richard Solomon wrote:
> ps: I usually buy a new radio every
> 6 or 7 years and a new Amp every 10.

Some of us can afford to do that. It took me 60 years in ham radio to be 
able afford a USED 87A. Before that, it was USED Ten Tec Titans.

The virtues of the 87A for my application are PIN diode QSK, auto-recall 
of tunings, and auto-retune (AlphaMax). Last I looked, current 
production Alpha products use vacuum relays, which are unacceptable to 
me because they wear out pretty fast when used for serious QSK 
contesting. That's why I replaced the Titans, which also use vacuum relays.

73, Jim K9YC


_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
  
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>