To: | amps@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [Amps] Ceramic capacitor ratings |
From: | Peter Chadwick <g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk> |
Reply-to: | g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk |
Date: | Fri, 13 Apr 2007 11:12:08 +0200 (CEST) |
List-post: | <mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
Why should the current have gone up? Yes, the unloaded coil Q is higher, but the working Q should, all things being otherwise equal, the same. Thus the circulating current is the same. There's less loss resistance in the coil, and as efficiency is proportional to the ratio of unloaded Q to loaded Q, the output is higher. The loss in the capacitors may or may not be negligible, but I don't see that it should have changed very much. 73 Peter G3RZP _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Amps] 2M 8877 Amplifier: No grid or plate current, jeff millar |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Amps] Ceramic capacitor ratings, Gary Schafer |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Amps] Ceramic capacitor ratings, Tom W8JI |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Amps] Ceramic capacitor ratings, Gary Schafer |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |