Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Air Variable Spacing Question

To: "Jim Garland" <4cx250b@muohio.edu>, <Amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] Air Variable Spacing Question
From: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 16:15:12 -0500
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Jim,

The 250pf OEP used in the SB-221, HL-2200 and as a wider spaced SB-220 cap would be ideal. Im all out at the moment but anyone who has converted those amps to 6M should have one laying around, its a .1" I believe.

The Cardwell cap you have, if its a 154-9, is listed at .075" and 3000V peak without breakdown at 70 deg F and 50% humidity iffn I remember.

Thats cutting it mighty close.

Carl



----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim Garland" <4cx250b@muohio.edu>
To: <TexasRF@aol.com>; <Amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 1:15 AM
Subject: Re: [Amps] Air Variable Spacing Question


Thanks for your note, Gerald. Your calculations are right on the mark.
Sounds like my .080" cap would have enough safety margin for my application. It's a nice Cardwell capacitor, but only about 250pF maximum, which I would pad for use on 160m. I just need enough capacitance range to tune the entire
band, and 250pF should be more than adequate. Carl KM1H suggested a 0.1in
custom OEP capacitor, and that's a reasonable approach also. I have a couple
of nice OEP caps on hand, though they're not right for this application. I
suppose I could use the .080 cap, but leave enough room for a larger custom
cap if the need arises.

73,

Jim W8ZR



From: TexasRF@aol.com [mailto:TexasRF@aol.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2012 1:16 PM
To: 4CX250B; Amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] Air Variable Spacing Question



Jim, with a little reverse engineering and thinking through this: 2500v /
1.88A = 1330 / 1.8 = 739 ohms (approx).



One would hope for 60% efficiency so power generated = 2500v X 1.88A = 4700
(w input) X .6 = 2820w.



The voltage at 739 ohms = sqr( 2820 X 739) = 1444 rms. Peak voltage would be
1444 X 1.414 = 2042 v.



If the capacitor has a peak voltage rating of 3200 v then there would be a
safety margin of 3200 - 2042 = 1148 v peak. Or, room for a vswr mishap that
would cause an increase of about 56% of the transformed impedance.



While not bullet proof, it seems if you were to take care that the amplifier
would always have a reasonable load this would work just fine. It probably
is a good idea to roughly calibrate the tune and load settings vs frequency to prevent a tuning situation allowing the plate load impedance to rise to a
damaging level.



So, in my mind the plate load impedance is very important.



If my numbers are off I am sure an eagle eyed reader will catch it!



73,

Gerald K5GW





In a message dated 12/5/2012 3:03:42 A.M. Central Standard Time,
4cx250b@muohio.edu writes:

Hi All,

I'm trying to decide which air variable plate tuning cap to use on my
forthcoming 160m monoband amplifier. The one I'd like to use has .080" plate spacing, and I've tested it and it works up to 3200 VDC on my tester before
sparking across the gap. My question is whether that's enough of a safety
margin to use with 2500V plate voltage on three GU-74Bs? Not that it matters particularly, but the plate impedance of the three tubes is about 740 ohms.
There'll be no DC voltage on the cap.



I also have several air variables with .075 in spacing, and one with .140"
spacing. The latter I've tested to 6kV, but want to save it for a different
project. In principle, I'd like to use one of the .075" caps for my
monobander, because of their convenient size, but I think that's cutting it
a bit close for 2500V. Whaddya think?

73,

Jim W8ZR

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

=

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps


-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1427 / Virus Database: 2634/5443 - Release Date: 12/07/12


_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>