| To: | Catherine James <catherine.james@att.net>, 'Bill Turner' <dezrat@outlook.com>, 'Amps group' <amps@contesting.com>, Jim Garland <4cx250b@miamioh.edu> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Amps] "Conventional" current flow |
| From: | Catherine James <catherine.james@att.net> |
| Date: | Mon, 21 Nov 2016 08:27:37 -0800 |
| List-post: | <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
And the best summary I've seen of our confusion about the fundamental forces: https://m.xkcd.com/1489/ Be sure click on the alt text link and get the punchline! 73, Cathy N5WVR _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Amps] "Conventional" current flow, Catherine James |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Amps] "Conventional" current flow, Mike Waters |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Amps] "Conventional" current flow, Catherine James |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Amps] RF voltage on VHF strip line, Steve |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |