Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] 572B - News?

To: akozak@hourglass.com, amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] 572B - News?
From: Louis Parascondola via Amps <amps@contesting.com>
Reply-to: Louis Parascondola <gudguyham@aol.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2014 22:40:00 -0500
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Nope the mod changed the low voltage supply to a tripled to up the cutoff bias 
voltage

Sent from AOL Mobile Mail


-----Original Message-----
From: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>
To: amps <amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Fri, Nov 7, 2014 01:56 PM
Subject: Re: [Amps] 572B - News?



<div id="AOLMsgPart_1_9e9ea427-fd25-4b38-83a5-75f4e3b51906" style="margin: 
0px;font-family: Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, Sans-Serif;font-size: 12px;color: 
#000;background-color: #fff;">

<pre style="font-size: 9pt;"><tt>Plus, if I recall, there was a service 
bulletin on the 2100 (not sure it it applied to the Z variant) regarding the 
use of the Svetlana tubes.  The amp needed a modification (probably to the 
parasitic suppression?) to use that tube.

Al
AB2ZY
________________________________________
From: Amps <<a 
href="mailto:amps-bounces@contesting.com";>amps-bounces@contesting.com</a>> on 
behalf of Carl <<a 
href="mailto:km1h@jeremy.qozzy.com";>km1h@jeremy.qozzy.com</a>>
Sent: Friday, November 7, 2014 1:03 PM
To: David Harmon; 'Marcelo Cabral'; <a 
href="mailto:amps@contesting.com";>amps@contesting.com</a>
Subject: Re: [Amps] 572B - News?

The Svetlana works OK but has a smaller anode and less dissipation. They
havent been made in several years now.

Carl
KM1H


----- Original Message -----
From: "David Harmon" <<a 
href="mailto:k6xyz@sbcglobal.net";>k6xyz@sbcglobal.net</a>>
To: "'Marcelo Cabral'" <<a 
href="mailto:py1kr.marcelo@gmail.com";>py1kr.marcelo@gmail.com</a>>; <<a 
href="mailto:amps@contesting.com";>amps@contesting.com</a>>
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2014 12:25 PM
Subject: Re: [Amps] 572B - News?


> Marcelo.....
> Try to find some 572-B made by Svetlana.......they are much better
> quality.
> I have had several sets of them and I prefer them over the Chinese mfgd
> tubes.
>
>
> 73
>
> David Harmon
> K6XYZ
> Sperry, OK
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Amps [<a 
> href="mailto:amps-bounces@contesting.com?";>mailto:amps-bounces@contesting.com</a>]
>  On Behalf Of Marcelo
> Cabral
> Sent: Friday, November 7, 2014 11:18 AM
> To: <a href="mailto:amps@contesting.com";>amps@contesting.com</a>
> Subject: Re: [Amps] 572B - News?
>
> Hi, Carl!
>
> Good news at the end!
> Sincerely, I will try a MP pair of these new tubes after January, but I
> haven't big expectations about their reliability.
> But, if them survive at least one year, I must be finished the others
> projects and be able for start this mod for GI7B. For today, I'll buy some
> GI7B's from UR4LL, must be useful in a near future.
> Thanks everyone, hope to meet everybody in CQWW CW soon.
>
> Marcelo - PY1KR
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Carl [<a 
> href="mailto:km1h@jeremy.qozzy.com?";>mailto:km1h@jeremy.qozzy.com</a>]
> Sent: sexta-feira, 7 de novembro de 2014 14:52
> To: Marcelo Cabral; <a 
> href="mailto:amps@contesting.com";>amps@contesting.com</a>
> Subject: Re: [Amps] 572B - News?
>
> RF Parts will be taking new 572B orders in Jan 2015, Id rather wait than
> hack up a perfectly good amp for an inferior tube.
> <a href="http://www.rfparts.com/tubes/tubes-572b.html"; 
> target="_blank">http://www.rfparts.com/tubes/tubes-572b.html</a>
>
> Carl
> KM1H
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> <a href="mailto:Amps@contesting.com";>Amps@contesting.com</a>
> <a href="http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps"; 
> target="_blank">http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps</a>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> <a href="mailto:Amps@contesting.com";>Amps@contesting.com</a>
> <a href="http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps"; 
> target="_blank">http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps</a>
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - <a href="http://www.avg.com"; target="_blank">www.avg.com</a>
> Version: 2015.0.5315 / Virus Database: 4189/8529 - Release Date: 11/07/14
>

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
<a href="mailto:Amps@contesting.com";>Amps@contesting.com</a>
<a href="http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps"; 
target="_blank">http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps</a>
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
<a href="mailto:Amps@contesting.com";>Amps@contesting.com</a>
<a href="http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps"; 
target="_blank">http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps</a>
</tt></pre>
</div> <!-- end of AOLMsgPart_1_9e9ea427-fd25-4b38-83a5-75f4e3b51906 -->
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>