Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] 8877s

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] 8877s
From: w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net (w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net)
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 1997 09:38:11 +0000
> From:          w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net
> To:            marv h. gonsior
To: <amps@contesting.com>
> Date:          Tue, 1 Jul 97 12:13:33 +0000
> Subject:       Re: [AMPS] 8877s
> Priority:      normal

Marv,

I tried e-mailing this to you, but it bounced. 

> > A number of postings have made reference to a certain time span wherein
> > Eimac was having processing problems with their 8877. IF this is true,
> > would someone kindly let me know what info they have on this?  Thanks.
> 
> Hi Marv,
> 
> The 8877 was always a difficult tube to manufacture, but through the 
> mid to late 80's the tubes were failuer prone.
> 
> They had gold sputtering problems and grid to cathode shorts, Eimac 
> said this was related to air pollution in Salt Lake City 
> contaminating materials and a heat dam problem.
> 
> The current batches, made after 1992, have been excellent. I'd stay 
> far away from the 80's or early 90's code dates just to be safe.
> 
> 73, Tom W8JI 

 
73, Tom W8JI 

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [AMPS] 8877s, w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net <=