To: | <amps@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [AMPS] parasitics |
From: | km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com) |
Date: | Fri, 24 Apr 1998 09:30:45 EDT |
On Fri, 24 Apr 98 02:57:10 -0800 Rich Measures <measures@vc.net> writes: >....... >>>>First of all I have no particular disagreement with the use of a >>>>somewhat lossy material in the suppressor. >>> >>>At least, not since N7WS published his vhf suppressor measurements. > >> >>Actually I never heard of his measurements until you showed up on the >>reflector. My use predates yours by probably 30 years. >>BTW, how come Wes disavows all of your claims in his name???? >> >. Wes Stewart, N7WS was a supporter of Mr. Tom Rauch during the grate > >VHF parasitics debate which began c. Oct of 1996. Tom's position was >basically that a VHF suppressor could be built out of copper-wire that > >would equal the performance of a VHF suppressor made from >resistance-wire. SNIP Well at least there is one thing I am certain of....there are many ways to skin the cat. My own suppressor was designed particularly for 6M but it works just fine on HF also. At least there appears to be general agreement to phase out the old carbon compositions. 73 Carl KM1H _____________________________________________________________________ You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail. Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866] -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [AMPS] parasitics, Rich Measures |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [AMPS] Parasitics, Peter Chadwick |
Previous by Thread: | [AMPS] parasitics, Rich Measures |
Next by Thread: | [AMPS] parasitics, Rich Measures |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |